Samba replacement for Linux and Windows – A server stack is the collection of software that forms the operational infrastructure on a given machine. In a computing context, a stack is an ordered pile. A server stack is one type of solution stack — an ordered selection of software that makes it possible to complete a particular task. Like in this post about Samba replacement for Linux and Windows was one problem in server stack that need for a solution. Below are some tips in manage your linux server when you find problem about linux, windows, performance, samba, network-share.
I have a lot of machines (Windows and Linux) and one samba server.
I want to improve samba performance. How I should do this? I need a distributed file system, preferably Open Source. 🙂
I use glusterFS and it’s very good, because I need a solution that works on Windows too, not only Unix.
You don’t us tell anything about your problems. Please enhance your question with the following:
- Why do you want to replace Samba?
- What are your requirements?
- What is your current hardware and your budget?
- Do you want your solution free as in beer or free as in speech?
- AFAIK GlusterFS doesn’t work on Windows, but need a Samba share export. What do you mean?
Anyway, something to look into:
- Clustered Samba
- Faster servers
- DFS shares with Samba
because I need solution that works on Windows too
Either you’ve not explained your problem very well or you don’t understand the difference between the file sharing protocol and the disk filesystem.
In principle you could set up a cluster of Linux boxes using glusterFS for the storage, Samba for file service and a load balancer between the cluster and the MSWindows clients. If you decide to go down this route, your life will be a lot simpler if you use CTDB. Or you could use Samba’s own clustering solution (although I’m not sure hoow stable this is).
If, on the other hand, you require to have MSWindows boxes acting as servers then certainly this isn’t going to work – in which case have a look at AFS.
